I recently watched The DaVinci Code for the first time. (I have never read the book.) Yes, I am behind the times. What do you all think about Jesus being (possibly) married? Would it be wrong? Perhaps because the metaphor of Christ being united to his bride, the church, isn't supposed to happen until Christ returns? I can understand that. But, that metaphor aside, Christ had an earthly mother and family. He was born (aside of conception) the "earthly" way. He lived as man (but without sinning). So . . . why would it be bad for Christ to have an earthly wife? I'm not so sure I like the idea of it, or would have wanted him to, but I wonder at why I feel that way? Why does it seem wrong? If you think it seems wrong, why? If you think it would be fine, why? While I do not hold to anything the movie presented (for I know no other information/background on this whole "supposed conspiracy") it is easy for me to see (as a possibility) how the early church coud've might've downplayed/eradiacted Mary M's importance to the followers of Christ simply b/c she was a woman. But then I think of how Jesus was supposed to be the only son of God and if Mary M. had had Christ's child, wouldn't that child have been another son of God? I suppose that might have a good arguing position. Any thoughts on this? I haven't scoured (what I am sure amount to many) any of the websites on this hot topic. And I know I've seen Christian authors' books that debunk the whole thing, but I haven't touched those either. I wanted to see what everyone on here thought.