Another topic that I've been dealing with is morality. We discussed this in class, the idea of what makes us do good things. It would be so easy for us do evil, that's the selfish way of doing things, and I think that if we're honest with ourselves we'd have to admit that we really are selfish at heart, so what makes us do good? Comic books are what I know, so I find it helpful to look at them for inspiration. The answers that I find lead me to think about "Nature vs. Nurture" and I think that for me nurture wins out. I really like the show Smallville and in the first few seasons they did some really cool stuff with Clark Kent's early days. Those seasons insinuated that without out Clark's parents and their mid-western beliefs that Clark would have become a Weapon of Mass Destruction, so to speak. Clark becomes Superman because he was raised to be a giving, caring, compassionate person. Lex Luthor on the other hand has a terrible childhood. His father is overbearing who makes his life hell so that he can toughen him, make him strong enough to carry on the Luthor name. Because of this harsh upbringing Lex grows to become cynical, un-trusting, and ruthless. When we look at other comic characters we find this same situation. Spider-man had Uncle Ben to talk some sense into him, Bruce Wayne is the product of a mugging gone bad, etc. What do you think, does our up bringing have more effect on us or is it all genetic?


2 Comments:
Definitely, if we look at pop culture right now, nurture wins out. That's why shows like Dr. Phil and Oprah are so popular. Not that long ago, even just 50 years ago, nature was more the flavor. Mystery novels featured offspring of murderers, or if a person's parents were unfaithful they were likely to be unfaithful as well.
I'm more of a nurture fan myself, but is that because I've grown up in the last 20 years, where it's been more popular? They've found genes for aggression, etc, so what's to say all personality types aren't a result of genetics? But then we have to ask what personality has to do with morality. Can you be a nice person, and still rob old ladies on the side? Can you be an angry person and still give huge sums of money to charity?
Maybe morality is a nurture thing, and personality is a nature thing. But then we assume that morality has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with personality, and that can't be right. Like so many things, I think this is not an either/or situation. There must be a balance.
If these are even the only options for influence.
Nuture contorls our behavior, genetics contorls our features. Of course there is more depth to than that but my eyes are heavy and I can't think of anything intellignet to say.
Post a Comment
<< Home